CONCLUSION

For the foregoing reasons, the judgment of the District Court should be reversed and the case remanded for further proceedings.

Respectfully submitted,

 ____________________________ ____________________________

Edward L. Sadowsky                          Nathan Lewin

Andrew M. Zeitlin                               Grant R. Vinik

Tenzer, Greenblatt, L.L.P                    Miller, Cassidy,

The Chrysler Building                          Larroca & Lewin, L.L.P.

405 Lexington Avenue                        2555 M Street, N.W.

New York, New York 10174            Washington, D.C. 20037

(212) 885-5000                                 (202) 293-6400

                                                         Plaintiffs-Appellants

 May 20, 1999

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

Counsel for Appellants hereby certifies that on this 20^th day of May 1999, I caused to be placed in first class mail, postage prepaid, a copy of the Appellants’ Reply Brief addressed to:

Richard Hans                                     William M. Dreyer

King & Spalding                                Coca-Cola Company

1185 Avenue of the Americas            Coca-Cola Plaza

New York, NY 10036-4003             P.O. Drawer 1734

                                                         Atlanta, GA 30301

Carolyn Clark Campbell, Clerk

U.S. Court of Appeals

Second Circuit

1702 U.S. Courthouse

40 Foley Square

New York, NY 10007

_________________

Nathan Lewin

CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE

 Pursuant to Fed. R. App. P. 32(a)(7)(B), Counsel for Appellants certifies that the Appellants’ Reply Brief contains ________ words.

_________________

Nathan Lewin

DISCLAIMER