Jewish Law Logo Jewish Law - Examining Halacha, Jewish Issues and Secular Law
Bigio v. Coca Cola
United States District Court for

the Southern District of New


For the foregoing reasons, the judgment of the District Court should be reversed and the case remanded for further proceedings.

Respectfully submitted,

 ____________________________ ____________________________

Edward L. Sadowsky                          Nathan Lewin

Andrew M. Zeitlin                               Grant R. Vinik

Tenzer, Greenblatt, L.L.P                    Miller, Cassidy,

The Chrysler Building                          Larroca & Lewin, L.L.P.

405 Lexington Avenue                        2555 M Street, N.W.

New York, New York 10174            Washington, D.C. 20037

(212) 885-5000                                 (202) 293-6400

Of Counsel                                        Attorneys for


 May 20, 1999


Counsel for Appellants hereby certifies that on this 20th day of May 1999, I caused to be placed in first class mail, postage prepaid, a copy of the Appellants’ Reply Brief addressed to:

Richard Hans                                     William M. Dreyer

King & Spalding                                Coca-Cola Company

1185 Avenue of the Americas            Coca-Cola Plaza

New York, NY 10036-4003             P.O. Drawer 1734

                                                         Atlanta, GA 30301

Carolyn Clark Campbell, Clerk

U.S. Court of Appeals

Second Circuit

1702 U.S. Courthouse

40 Foley Square

New York, NY 10007


Nathan Lewin


 Pursuant to Fed. R. App. P. 32(a)(7)(B), Counsel for Appellants certifies that the Appellants’ Reply Brief contains ________ words.



Nathan Lewin

Page 6 of 6
1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6


Previous Page Legal Briefs Index
Page 6 of 6